Word & Character Counter
Words, characters, sentences and reading time, live as you type.
Text & Writing
Finds passive constructions, adverbs and hedging words.
The advice to "avoid passive voice" is stated far too absolutely. Passive exists because sometimes the actor is unknown, irrelevant, or deliberately de-emphasised.
"The samples were incubated for 24 hours" is correct scientific writing — who did the incubating is not the point, and naming them would be noise. "Mistakes were made" is the abuse of the same property, using it to hide an actor who does matter.
So the question is never "is this passive?" but "does the reader need to know who did this?". If yes, make it active. If no, leave it.
None of these is a rule. They are patterns that correlate with unclear writing often enough to be worth reviewing, and every one of them is correct somewhere.
Identifying passive voice reliably needs to know whether a word is a past participle, and English is full of forms that are both. "The door was closed" is passive if someone closed it and a description of a state if it simply was not open.
The detector here uses a participle list plus irregular forms, and will occasionally flag an adjective.
Treat every flag as a question, not a verdict. A checker that is never wrong about this would need to understand the sentence, which is a different class of tool.
No. It is the right choice when the actor is unknown, irrelevant or deliberately de-emphasised — as in most scientific method sections. The problem is using it to obscure an actor the reader needs.
Find who did the action and make them the subject. "The report was written by the team" becomes "The team wrote the report". If you cannot identify the actor, the passive may genuinely be correct.
Because "was closed" is passive if someone closed it and descriptive if it merely was not open. Distinguishing them requires understanding the sentence. Treat every flag as a question rather than a verdict.
A verb turned into a noun — "make a decision" for "decide", "provide assistance" for "help". They add words and drain energy, and converting them back to verbs usually shortens the sentence.
No, but a pile of -ly adverbs often marks weak verbs being propped up. "Ambled" carries what "walked slowly" needs two words to say.